Comments on: Online science http://scienceblog.darrouzet-nardi.net/?p=226 Tue, 02 Aug 2011 04:46:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.1 By: Anthony http://scienceblog.darrouzet-nardi.net/?p=226&cpage=1#comment-13486 Tue, 02 Aug 2011 04:46:19 +0000 http://anthony.darrouzet-nardi.net/scienceblog/?p=226#comment-13486 Thanks for the link. Cool site (not that I understand any of the topics though!). I agree 100% that math and physics are ahead of the curve and we will probably all end up with a publishing system more like what they have now. I guess I didn’t see the author as trying to ignore this, but instead pointing out that a lot of disciplines are pretty amazingly behind the curve. Plus the mini-bio of Nate Silver was interesting too. I loved the part where he mentions Silver’s online event ‘Burrito Bowl I.” Amazing that that was his prequel to his massively successful NYT blog!

]]>
By: Nadia http://scienceblog.darrouzet-nardi.net/?p=226&cpage=1#comment-13485 Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:49:00 +0000 http://anthony.darrouzet-nardi.net/scienceblog/?p=226#comment-13485 The article only grudgingly seems to concede that some fields, particularly math and physics, are doing a really excellent job of using the web. I mean, the web was invented so that physicists could share data. That extends not just to the ArXiv and other preprint servers and blogs, but also to things like http://mathoverflow.net/

]]>