LTER meeting in Estes Park

September 10, 2012 – 6:44 pm

I arrived in Estes Park yesterday to attend the LTER (Long Term Ecological Research) network meeting this week. I like this meeting because there are a lot of ecosystem scientists that do work closely aligned with my interests. These are my people. I’m presenting the above poster on data from our three summers of field data from the Arctic. (click poster for pdf).

Comments Off

A new Darrouzet-Nardi

August 17, 2012 – 12:59 am

Blog’s been on the back burner recently since the birth of my daughter Cara on June 29th:

So far a successful experiment!

I’m at Toolik right now tying up loose ends for the third and final field season of our project. When we arrived on August 11th, I was struck at how green it was here, definitely greener than last year at that time. However, within the first couple of days, the landscape turned from green to yellow and is well on its way now to red and brown. We have been busy taking a final round of soil cores and now taking the site down.


Just before arriving here, I had a nice trip to ESA in Portland and saw lots of friends and lots of great talks, particularly by some of my fellow postdocs I’ve met at Toolik and elsewhere. I want to post a few observations about the conference soon.

While the tundra is enchanting as always, I can’t wait to get back home to my sweet little baby and her heroic mom.

1 Comment »

Microplate calculation spreadsheets

June 7, 2012 – 5:24 pm

Not to interrupt the flow of pretty pictures from the arctic, but I have to address an important topic: microplate calculation spreadsheets.

I know this is for a narrow audience, but I’m always surprised by how much finding random things like this online can help me, so here we go.

The goal is to paste raw microplate data into a spreadsheet and get out the final numbers you need. If you had thousands of microplates, it might be better to write a short program that can process the data, but for everyday lab analyses that change frequently and are implemented by many lab personnel that don’t program stuff, the spreadsheet is a good tool.

I’ve made a lot of these spreadsheets over the last few years to help process enzyme and nutrient data. Here’s one I made recently. It has a few parts in the different worksheets: (1) the blank template in which raw data can be pasted; (2) a pipetting map to be printed so that you know where to put your samples when you are pipetting; (3) simulated data that helps to identify the assumptions you are making about sources of well absorbance (for colorimetric assays) or in this case fluorescence; and (4) a run with the modeled data to help spot errors in the spreadsheet.

Here are some guidelines I have learned over the last couple years that I think make these spreadsheets more useful for our lab group.

(1) Label all the parameters. In particular, formulas should only have references to other cells, not any hard values like mass of soil used or volume of extractant, etc. This will prevent having to search all cells whenever you change one of these variables.

(2) Highlight anything you have to enter when samples are run so you don’t forget anything.

(3) Don’t make overly complicated formulas that are difficult to decipher later. To prevent this, divide up long calculations into two or more steps so each is more clear.

(4) Test the spreadsheet with simulated data that you create to look similar to real data but with nice round values. This will help you identify assumptions in the way calculations are made as well as locate typos in calculations across many spreadsheet cells.

(5) Make the output of your spreadsheet into a well organized table (below) that has only sample ID information and the final values in preferred units. Then you can grab these values to use for stats and comparison with other assays, leaving all the processing behind.

Comments Off

Last day at Toolik

May 28, 2012 – 10:02 pm

I take off from Toolik the day after tomorrow. Here’s a time series of photos from our experiment, starting on April 28, and ending on May 27. The acclerated plots melted about 10 days before the control plots.

Control plot:

Snowmelt acceleration plot:
Here’s the whole series from last year.


Comments Off

Solar Eclipse at Toolik

May 20, 2012 – 9:47 pm

Toolik Eclipse

5:20 p.m. Taken through a piece of welding mask glass.

Comments Off

Vole attack

May 18, 2012 – 9:06 pm

tussock in OTC dug up by vole

We were monitoring plants in our freshly melted tundra plots and we noticed that this Eriophorum had signs of herbivory.

vole hay

The vegetation and organic material had been turned into hay piles by a vole.

Then, like Kane, as we stood up and looked around, we realized they were EVERYWHERE.


More caribou pictures

May 3, 2012 – 7:44 pm

Click for bigger versions

Caribou (dots on lower right) grazing by moonlight in front of the Brooks Range. I think they are eating the tasty vegetation in the long-term fertilized research plots. This was about 10:30 p.m. last night. Temp was around –5°F.

They are very focused on eating and rarely look up.

This one must have an itch or something.

Speck-sized caribou on a distant ridge grazing in front of the arctic sunset.

Update (5/4): Saw a herd running today.

Caribou beneath the “supermoon

Update (5/7): Finally got a decent closeup


Snowmelt Project: Year 3

April 28, 2012 – 8:00 pm

Today, for the third and final year of this project, Sadie and I got our snowmelt acceleration treatment up and running.

This is the site after we deployed shadecloth on our five accelerated snowmelt plots.

There are tons of caribou around right now. These guys wandered near our plots, then took off after staring at us for a while.

The deployment went great. The snow looked good and the weather was excellent. If temperatures stay this warm, melt will be quick!


Writing Science

April 20, 2012 – 12:22 pm

Our lab group just finished reading this book by Josh Schimel. We read two chapters a week and discussed them, which was a nice pace for absorbing the material. It’s easy to read, but there is so much good advice that it’s nice to have time for it to sink in.

Overall, the book is fantastic. It feels like a secret weapon. I can’t recommend it enough for any science writer at any stage. At the book’s Amazon page, I felt similarly to this reviewer:

I have 70 published papers in international, peer-reviewed journals; and I want to go back to each and every one of them and rewrite them with the messages from this book clear in my head and clear to the reader.

Fortunately I found the book earlier than this guy, but I am also eyeing my past papers and realizing how I could have made them much better.


Global seasonality

April 17, 2012 – 3:50 pm


I tweeted:

I’m referring to the animated gif above. Click for the full size version.

I then had the following email exchange with my mom:

Mom: Anthony, what is going on in that graphic? Is it a joke?

Me: lol no joke, it’s actual satellite images of seasonal change in earth surface color throughout the year. Mainly you can see snow extent and when different parts of the world are in their growing seasons.

Mom: Ah ok — so what ten things did you learn? Clearly you need specialized knowledge to interpret that animation.

Challenge accepted! Here are 10 things I did not know before staring at this graphic for a while:

1. While there is permanent snow/ice cover in Antarctica, there is almost no seasonal snow cover in the southern hemisphere.

2. Permanent snow/ice cover near the north pole includes not just Greenland, but also many other large islands in northern Canada like the Sverdrup islands.

3. During the winter, the boreal forest is not as white as the tundra above or the plains below (lower albedo), presumably due to the trees poking out from the snow.

4. In Australia, plants on the northern coast green up in the summer while plants on the southern coast green up in the winter.

5. A huge swath of Brazil has deciduous vegetation (also, Madagascar).

7. The rainforests of South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia that stay green all year round are a lot greener than even peak greenness in the nearby seasonal ecosystems.

8. The permanent snow in the Himalayas is mostly constrained to a thin band where the subcontinent is smashing into Asia.

9. The Amazon river becomes so massive during the rainy season you can see it from space (at least I assume that is what’s going on there).

10. The Nile River delta dries up twice a year. Notice how it flickers more than once per annual cycle in the gif. Here’s an animation that confirms this.

Also, this is more geography, but I had never noticed the Kerguelen Islands before. Looks like it is pretty snowy there in the winter.

And a final observation from an imgur commenter in Britain:


ggplot2: I’m a convert

April 12, 2012 – 4:56 pm

I have been using lattice  for my R graphics for years, and it is a great software package based on William Cleveland’s groundbreaking approach to analyzing data. However, a few weeks ago I was trying to show data points, means, and summary bars in the same graphic, a task that should be straightforward in a graphics environment. This is not impossible in lattice, but does involve writing a cumbersome “panel function.” This approach was great for its time – when lattice came out there was nothing else like it – but unfortunately it has not evolved into a more user-friendly system.

Having read about ggplot2, I knew that it had a more modular system where you can add or subtract different graphical elements such as summary stats or data points at will. So, I tried it for the data I was working on and never looked back.

Here’s my first ggplot2 figure that drew me to switch:

It took minimal effort to learn the ggplot2 system. In addition to the useful modular design, the default approaches to tasks such as automatic legend creation, log axes, and jittering are well done.

While I know an upgrade when I see one, I will also miss lattice since I think it’s a fantastic piece of open source software that was my analysis workhorse for the last eight years. It was also one of the packages that really motivated me to learn R.

Comments Off

Plant stress master variable: non-structural carbon?

April 6, 2012 – 4:05 pm

Our lab group recently read a 2010 review paper by Ülo Niinemets that presents the interesting hypothesis that the effects of various stresses on tree behavior can be summarized using the master variable of “nonstructural” or “storage” carbon. The idea is that if the plant is doing well, it will store extra carbon to use in case of stress such as waterlogging, heat wave, water stress, or anything else that prevents it from photosynthesizing. When stresses arrive, the trees start using up that carbon. When the storage carbon is gone, they are at risk of death if the stress does not end:

Currently the effects of various stresses cannot be deconvoluted in field environments, but storage carbon size likely provides an important point of convergence of various stress pathways. The predictions based on non-structural carbon pools suggest that maintenance of higher storage carbon pools increases the tolerance of sustained stress.

Could understanding plant stress be as simple as this? Probably not, but it’s a nice place to start. We are thinking about doing some preliminary analyses with some of our arctic plants. Our idea is to take plant tissues, enzymatically degrade the starches into sugar and then measure the total sugar pool. We think that our snowmelt acceleration treatment may be stressing the plants. If we do see reductions in nonstructural carbon in those plants, it would be consistent with our hypothesis of plant stress and could provide a nice piece of evidence. The review also mentions that in the future, we may find more sophisticated correlates like VOCs to help us nondestructively assess plant stress level.


One of my favorite book lists

April 2, 2012 – 4:33 pm

Here’s a list I got from an Edward Tufte one-day seminar in 2001. I read a lot of the books on the list (you can see my library call numbers I scrawled on there back in the day). They were instrumental in helping me understand how to interpret and present scientific information.

The web stuff is almost certainly way out of date; everything else is still great. I particularly recommend the William Cleveland books (the one you can’t see is Visualizing Data). Statistics classes should start with Visualizing Data instead of standard textbooks.

Edward Tufte still does the one day course and it is excellent. Grad students in particular are at a great stage to benefit, so I highly recommend it to them.


Spring has begun in Toledo

March 26, 2012 – 4:54 pm


It’s been an early spring here in Toledo and indeed throughout the Eastern United States. In Washington DC, the cherry blossoms peaked on March 20, one of the earlier recorded dates.



NPR even ran a fun story about phenology, the study of the timing of biological events like plant flowering dates.

This Magnolia is right around the corner from our house. Nice!


Comments Off

Cool trend: the video abstract

March 9, 2012 – 1:03 pm

Here’s my friend Jennie McLaren’s video abstract for her presentation at the International Polar Year conference:

Here’s one about Arctic ground squirrels by another Toolik friend, Michael Sheriff:

And there are a bunch more in the IPY channel. These videos have been viewed dozens of times, which doesn’t sound like a lot, but is probably already more times than all of my previous conference abstracts combined have been read. Cool science projects and youtube seem to go together well. The one-minute length is smart too.

Comments Off

Documentary: If a Tree Falls

March 6, 2012 – 8:33 pm

Last weekend, I enjoyed watching If a Tree Fallsa documentary about a group of arsonists in the Earth Liberation Front. The film was both educational and a fascinating story. It illuminates some important aspects to environmental activism in the 1990s and early 2000s and the filmmakers do a great job of answering an obvious question: what were the arsonists thinking? It also has an interesting sort of reverse mystery — we already know whodunnit, but it’s interesting to see who figured it out and how.

One of the fun things for me in watching the story unfold was that I remember seeing news stories about a lot of the events in the film and I feel like I have been on the periphery of the communities in which the events took place. I remember protesting old-growth logging with a youth environmental group when I was in high school. I remember hearing about the “black bloc” anarchists from friends who attended the Seattle WTO protests when I was in college. I remember hearing about the burning of a scientific poplar plantation in Oregon from a guest speaker at CU as a grad student.

While I obviously don’t agree with arson as a tactic, I and many other environmentalists are in the awkward position of agreeing with the arsonists on some of the issues that motivated them. For example, it is in fact tragic and shortsighted to clear-cut the few remaining old growth forests on the west coast. Also, the frenzy to brand people “terrorists” so that prosecutors and law enforcement can claim to have bagged them is worrisome. In the end, I don’t think their misguided approach to addressing these problems has had a huge impact one way or another because it is clear that they are well outside of the mainstream.


Blowing snow in the alpine

March 1, 2012 – 5:29 pm

Here are some fun videos of blowing snow on Niwot Ridge from a couple of days ago. Winds can top 120 mph up there.

Blowing snow is an important physical process that shapes ecosystem function in the alpine tundra. Here’s a figure from a good overview of alpine ecosystems:


The mesotopographic model developed by Billings (1973). Alpine plant communities are formed by the spatial gradients created by snow cover, which is generated by wind exposure and topographic position.

Comments Off

Spatial biogeochemistry

February 25, 2012 – 12:30 pm

I’ve seen a couple interesting papers recently on spatial biogeochemistry, a topic I enjoyed working on during my dissertation. Here’s how I described the importance of spatial biogeochemistry in one of my dissertation papers. In this case, I was discussing nitrogen (N) import and export from ecosystems, but the same case can be made for other biogeochemical processes.

Our current understanding of N import and export is based primarily on point estimates or on integrated estimates from hydrologic data. While these estimates provide a valuable foundation for understanding these processes, more detailed measurements that take spatial heterogeneity into account are likely to reveal important biogeochemical phenomena at larger scales, especially in the complex terrain of mountain ecosystems.

In a study of interannual variation in landscape carbon flux, Diego Riveros-Iregui and his colleagues found that:

Based on soil respiration measurements taken at a subalpine forest in central Montana, we found that locations with high drainage areas (i.e., lowlands and wet areas of the forest) had higher cumulative soil respiration in dry years, whereas locations with low drainage areas (i.e., uplands and dry areas of the forest) had higher cumulative soil respiration in wet years.

A nice finding. From this, they conclude:

These results highlight that evaluating and predicting ecosystem-scale soil C response to climate fluctuation requires detailed characterization of biophysical-topographic interactions in addition to biophysical-climate interactions.

I think they are correct that taking spatial variation into account is one of final frontiers in understanding ecosystem carbon cycling. Diego was a postdoc at CU when I was  a grad student there; now he’s faculty at the University of Nebraska. They are lucky to have him as I think he is becoming a leader in this research area.

In another recent study of N export from watersheds, Ross et al. were able to make a quantitative link between the magnitude of soil processes and N export in streams.

Stream NO3 export was positively related to nitrification rates … These spatial relationships found here suggest a strong influence of near-stream and near-watershed-outlet soils on measured stream NO3 export.

There were a few caveats to this relationship, but it is impressive that they were able to document this link at all since it is difficult to meaningfully measure the magnitude of these soil microbial processes.

Comments Off

Research Works Act, ctd.

February 3, 2012 – 12:54 pm

There has been some interesting development in the case of the Research Works Act. Some grassroots activism has now forced Elsevier to respond to the criticisms of scientists:

A protest against Elsevier, the world’s largest scientific journal publisher, is rapidly gaining momentum since it began as an irate blog post at the end of January. By Tuesday evening, about 2,400 scholars had put their names to an online pledge not to publish or do any editorial work for the company’s journals, including refereeing papers.

Elsevier did provide a little bit more information on what they see as their role in adding value to scientific research:

“What publishers charge for is the distribution system. We identify emerging areas of research and support them by establishing journals. We pay editors who build a distinguished brand that is set apart from 27,000 other journals. We identify peer reviewers. And we invest a lot in infrastructure, the tags and metadata attached to each article that makes it discoverable by other researchers through search engines, and that links papers together through citations and subject matter. All of that has changed the way research is done today and makes it more efficient. That’s the added value that we bring.”

Judge for yourself whether you are convinced. Conspicuously missing from their comments was any indication they would retract support for the Research Works Act. There was also this:

I’m not sure why we are the focus of this boycott, but I’m very concerned about one dissatisfied scientist, and I’m concerned about 2,000.

Tough question! Here’s a hint.

1 Comment »

No such thing as humus?

January 31, 2012 – 5:39 pm

My soil nerd friends on Facebook have been linking this nice article from Science News discussing the importance of soils to global carbon among other topics. It has lots of good quotes and explanations by cutting-edge groups. One of the most interesting parts is the suggestion that there is no such thing as humus:

One old idea in particular is now in question, with the challenge culminating in a recent report in the journal Nature. Under fire is the belief that soil remains stubbornly soil, a large fraction of its organic materials resistant to decay because of the accumulation of large molecules called humic substances. One professional society devoted to the substances is in the odd position of hearing colleagues label as fiction its primary topic of study.

The idea presented in the article is that it doesn’t make sense energetically that these large resistant molecules will form in soils and that instead compounds as simple as sugars may be preserved in soils through other mechanisms. I did see a lot of talks at AGU in December about the importance of physical occlusion and other forms of stabilization in soils. I think as people continue to bring fancier methods from analytical chemistry (mass spec, HPLC, fluorometry, etc) to bear on these questions, we will in fact have to redefine what soil organic matter is chemically. However, it may be too soon to say that there is no such thing as chemical resistance to decomposition.

Comments Off

R tip: Sorting and keeping track of many response variables

January 23, 2012 – 5:03 pm

When doing the same analyses on many different response variables, it can be hard to keep track of the variables and have R print graphs and other output with the response variables of choice in the desired order. Here’s an example of the column names from a multivariate data set I’m working with:

> names(nts.summ)
[1] "date" "Season" "Plot" "DOC" "MBC" "DON" "MB.N"
[8] "NH4" "NO3" "moisture" "NAG" "CBH" "AG" "BG"
[15] "LAP" "BXYL" "PHOS" "PHENOX" "NetPerox" "UREASE" "logNH4"
[22] "logNO3" "logLAP" "logPHENOX" "logNetPerox" "microbialCN" "extractCN" "tempmax"
[29] "tempmin" "tempmean"

To make these easier to work with, I keep a character vector with the response variable names in the desired order (variables) and then create a reference vector (y) with a short for loop:

variables = c("DOC", "DON", "extractCN", "MBC", "MB.N", "microbialCN","NH4", "NO3", "NAG", "CBH", "AG", "BG", "BXYL", "PHOS", "LAP", "PHENOX", "NetPerox", "UREASE", "moisture", "tempmean")
y = NA; for(x in 1:length(variables)) {
  y[x] <- which(names(nts.summ)==variables[x]) }

> y
[1] 4 6 27 5 7 26 8 9 11 12 13 14 16 17 15 18 19 20 10 30

Now if I want to do a scatterplot matrix or, say, print the median for each variable, I can use the reference vector y.

for (x in y) print(median(nts[,x],na.rm=T))

The reference vector y can easily be modified as the analyses evolve. For example, if I decide to switch to a log-transformed version of a few variables, I just change their names in the code for variables, create a new y, and re-run.

Comments Off

Research Works Act

January 17, 2012 – 4:39 pm

Scientists’ opposition to the Research Works Act is getting a lot of attention (e.g., here and here). I feel as many scientists do that this bill would make our job of disseminating information harder in order to enrich publishers. That doesn’t seem like a good deal. At this point, it is up to the publishers to convince me that they are providing value for their work that justifies the high prices they charge.

I see scientists writing, editing, and peer reviewing manuscripts. I see publishers facilitating peer review by providing clunky and chronically out-of-date online tools as well as doing a mediocre job typesetting and copy editing our articles. In my experience, these services have been outsourced to overseas companies with poor communication skills. The typesetting and print publishing are also a waste of money since we all have internet. Their online publication systems are also clunky, with poor search functionality, spammy TOC alerts, and cookie-cutter websites.

Finally, it’s insulting when I work for years on a project and then, upon publication, have to sign over my copyright to a journal that then turns around and asks if I want to buy that copyright back for $3000 (that was what Springer asked on my last publication). The only reason I and many other scientists put up with this absurd arrangement is that the industry has been savvy about maintaining control of the high profile journals in which we need to publish to advance our careers.

Hopefully the press surrounding this issue will lead to education and grass-roots action among scientists. It may be easier than we think to submit our work to publishers that we trust to make it freely available and even deny peer review services to the worst corporate offenders like Elsevier.

Comments Off

Minor data victory

January 13, 2012 – 3:29 pm

No groundbreaking discoveries or anything – I was just pleased to see that we got a good match between two runs of the same samples (units are µM amino acids). I’ve been working on a microplate procedure for measuring total free amino acids in soil extracts with our lab tech Mallory. These results are good since we’ve been running this procedure on hundreds of samples over the last two weeks. This is also the last data we need for a short note we are writing on the procedure, so it’s a nice way to start the weekend.

1 Comment »

Mountain pine beetles and ecosystem carbon

January 12, 2012 – 4:18 pm

Really nice video here featuring a couple of my advisors from CU as well as my good friend Nicole Trahan. Videos like this may not rack up Bieber-level interest on Youtube, but for those that care – including policy makers and students – this seems like a great way to get across the main ideas of a research project to a broader audience. I hope more groups follow this lead.

As for the science, it’s interesting to see the importance of root exudates to the story of ecosystem carbon balance in these forests. We have been moving in the same direction of focusing on root-microbe interactions on our Arctic project.

Comments Off

Ongoing debate over effects of N deposition on forest carbon storage

January 10, 2012 – 4:44 pm

There was an interesting note in the most recent Global Change Biology about whether N deposition might fertilize temperate forests and cause them to remove and store carbon from the atmosphere, providing some small relief from ever-climbing atmospheric CO2 levels. Author Peter Högberg writes:

It was first widely held that N deposition should increase tree growth in the northern hemisphere, in particular (e.g., Townsend et al., 1996); the Kyoto protocol even stated that this effect should be accounted for. However, based on the distribution of 15N tracer added experimentally to forests in Europe and N. America, Nadelhoffer et al. (1999) proposed that the effect of N additions on C sequestration should be minor as they found that most 15N ended up in the soil rather than in the above-ground parts of the trees. Their proposition was challenged by Magnani et al. (2007), who, based on estimates of net ecosystem production (NEP) derived from eddy-covariance studies, argued that the correlation between C sequestration and N deposition was very strong, with a slope indicating that many hundreds of kg of C were sequestered per kg of N deposited on the forest.

Högberg then goes on to provide some evidence that the correlation between NEP and N deposition may not be causal since humans tend to populate (and pollute) areas that are already more productive and likely to naturally sequester more C. It is an interesting explanation of the data and I will be curious to see any response Magnani et al. may have. Either way, it is certainly difficult to figure out what atmospherically deposited N does in these ecosystems since there is still a lot we don’t know about belowground ecosystems and tree ecophysiology.

Comments Off

How to find a good cheap laptop

January 2, 2012 – 5:37 pm

I recently bought a new laptop and it’s worked out well for me so I wanted to share what I discovered in the search process. I am by no means an expert in the laptop market, but it can be helpful anyway to hear from someone like me who attempted their own product research and ended up with something they liked. So here is what I learned:

1. Brand is irrelevant. The exception of course is Apple. I have had a lot of good Apple products over the years and if you have plenty of money, buying Apple is a good way to ensure your machine will have good components and generally not suck. However, this post is about cheap laptops.

2. For cheap laptops, you can’t get (or at least I couldn’t find) a mix-and-match your own components type of vendor, so you have to choose among the pre-assembled options. When I went into this, I was thinking that I didn’t need a CD drive since they are increasingly obsolete. However, all cheap laptops had them, so I didn’t have a choice.

3. At the low end ($300-$800), the main thing separating laptops is their processing power, so a laptop is a good deal if it has high processing power for a low price. The other components are pretty standardized at the lower prices. When I was looking, they all had a 15″ screen, probably 1366*768, 500GB hard drive (more than enough for almost all users), and 4GB RAM (don’t skimp on RAM).

4. Review sites like CNET are pretty much useless. It’s not impossible that you will discover a useful nugget about why a particular machine sucks, but these reviews tend to be really subjective and bad at comparing the hundreds of available choices. User reviews on vendor sites can be slightly more useful, but still should not guide your narrowing process.

5. The best comparative shopping tool I found was on It allows you to sort many different ways and narrow by particular features. There may be one or two other good comparison tools online, but I was surprised by how much these tools tended to suck. Even the Amazon one is crap. After sorting by price on newegg, you can isolate the dozen or so low-price machines that are currently available.

7. To choose among those, evaluate their processor performance by checking their listed CPUs and GPUs on these lists. One trick here is that the GPUs are often integrated into the CPU, so that can be helpful in identifying the GPU by looking for a similar number.

This is where you will find a lot of variation. Some machines are cheap because they are a good deal and others are cheap because they have crap chips from two years ago. You also want to be able to see if you are paying a lot for a small performance boost or vice versa. These lists are the only quantitative way I found to assess differences among the chips. Don’t just check CPU: you want good graphics performance for streaming media and even just navigating through your files and apps.

8. Finally, once you identify a model you like, read the user reviews on newegg and amazon and elsewhere to see what they say. If you did good research, you may discover that other users can confirm for you that they came to the same conclusions. Also, search around the web to see if any of the other vendors have good deals on your model. I found my machine on newegg, but then Amazon ended up having a sale on it so I got it there.

I ended up with a machine that was $425 on amazon with a CPU benchmark of 3562 (AMD A6-3400M) and a GPU benchmark of 453 (AMD Radeon HD 6520G). Thanks to the glory of the invisible hand, you should be able to find an even better deal today.


DOE launching a big project on Arctic carbon

December 19, 2011 – 8:19 pm

From a Nature news article:

The US Department of Energy (DOE) is embarking on a US$100-million research programme … designed to develop a fine-scale model that can simulate how soil microbes, plants and groundwater interact on the scale of centimetres to tens of metres, to control the amount of organic carbon stored underground in the permafrost zone. That model will be incorporated into the planetary-scale Earth-system models used to forecast how climate evolves under different emissions scenarios.

It sounds like it will be similar in size and scope to the FACE experiments, a set of CO2 enrichment experiments familiar to most ecologists. The goal to include belowground ecology in their models is quite ambitious, but hey, why not think big? I look forward to seeing how this project unfolds.

Comments Off

Major NYT article on Arctic permafrost carbon

December 17, 2011 – 2:43 pm

Don’t miss this article in the New York Times this morning about Arctic permafrost carbon. It’s an excellent summary of a lot of current Arctic carbon research and makes a great case for the relevance of our current Arctic project and the many others like it.

It draws together a lot of the points I’ve made over the last couple months on this blog including our uncertainty of the fate of permafrost C, the potential for a big global warming feedback, and the importance of fires, thermokarst, and good old decomposition. It also does a great job with methane, which I haven’t talked about much. Compared to my blog of course, the article presents the story in a much better package that people will actually read.

I generally agree with the presentation of the facts in the article, but I would make one adjustment to the story. To some extent, the article downplays the importance of the carbon-in, carbon-out equation. It does mention that:

The essential question scientists need to answer is whether the many factors they do not yet understand could speed the release of carbon from permafrost — or, possibly, slow it more than they expect.

For instance, nutrients released from thawing permafrost could spur denser plant growth in the Arctic, and the plants would take up some carbon dioxide.

As a nitrogen nerd, I love the nutrient shoutout, but the broader point is that beyond nutrients, the warming temperatures and increased atmospheric CO2 themselves are likely to make plants photosynthesize more, that is, take in more carbon. The balance of higher photosynthesis vs. increased decomposition is one of the hardest things to figure out. Thus, the “broccoli in the freezer/refrigerator” analogy would be more accurate if freezer/refrigerator also containted a live photosynthesizing Brassica oleracea plant.

Despite the uncertainty about what will in fact happen to Arctic permafrost carbon, I don’t think the article at all overstates the seriousness with which we should take this threat. It might not all go up in smoke and microbial respiration – but it might – and we have to take that seriously. Anyway, kudos to journalist Justin Gillis for bringing this interesting and important story to the masses. Looks like he has some other nice global change articles in the NYT here.

Comments Off

Microbial communities in melting permafrost

December 14, 2011 – 4:23 pm

There is a cool new study in Nature about changes in the soil microbial community at the time of thaw. Using some cutting edge genomics-based approaches in which they sequenced massive amounts of DNA in frozen and unfrozen soil cores, the authors were able to show that:

…during transition from a frozen to a thawed state there are rapid shifts in many microbial, phylogenetic and functional gene abundances and pathways.

This past week at AGU, I was talking with some colleagues about microbial community composition during thaw. Some of the data from our Arctic project shows a rapid change in microbial C:N ratio combined with high nutrient levels in the soil solution around the time of thaw. My best explanation for those data is that there is a microbial turnover event in which lysed microbial cells release nutrients, which are subsequently taken up by new microbes. The great data that this team was able to generate seems consistent with that idea.

There were also some cool nitrogen-related findings like this:

Several genes involved in the N cycle shifted in abundance during thaw (Fig. 3c). For example, nitrate reductase I genes significantly increased, suggesting nitrate was available as a terminal electron acceptor, which was confirmed by its presence in the chemical data

Obviously these methods have a lot of potential for major advances in our understanding of soil ecology, which probably explains why there are so many departments seeking to add researchers familiar with these techniques to their faculty.

Although these findings don’t speak directly to the fate of permafrost carbon, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are huge changes in microbial function when soils thaw; the nature of those changes will likely dictate what happens to the stored C.


AGU Fall Meeting poster

December 6, 2011 – 12:07 am

I am attending the American Geophysical Union (AGU) Fall Meeting this week along with about 20,000 other geonerds.

My poster (click to enlarge) is in the Friday morning session (GC51F-1070). On Wednesday afternoon, our whole Alaska project crew will meet and I’m looking forward to putting together all of the different parts. Other than that, I plan to check out a lot of science and enjoy SF.